Affirmative Action: You’re getting off light

My friend, the amazing poet Scott Woods, has some shit to say about Affirmative Action. You should read it.

Source: Affirmative Action: You’re getting off light

Contrary to the statements made by Supreme Court Justice Scalia recently, affirmative action isn’t about sub-standard people’s worth being rewarded. It’s about the playing field of opportunities not being level before any number of candidates ever shows up for your job/school/opportunity.

You can’t apply all of the machinery of racism and sexism for hundreds or thousands of years on people and their descendants, then say the field is level and we should run everything magically on merit. You can’t even prove you’re capable of that as a society. All evidence – and it mounts every day – suggests America has no interest in a merit based system of access. America isn’t capable, ready or willing to enact actual equality. So you have to give up some fraction of what you own (owe, really) because you don’t want to straighten the level where it really matters. You don’t want to stop gentrification or pay for good schools or give women equal pay or stop police abuse or pay reparations, so guess what: you have to make a piece of what you got at least give the appearance that we live here too. Trust me: you’re getting off light.

Affirmative action is what you have to pay until you decide you’re going to stop being horrible in dozens of other areas of life. 

Advertisements

The Real Deal with the Millenial Generation

My friend Grey wrote a fantastic bit about the constant harping on “Millenials” for being lazy and entitled and I thought more people should read it, so I am posting his writing here. I know a lot of folks younger than me who are struggling with temp jobs and student loan debt and it’s fucked. It’s time their voices are heard, so here ya go. 

Guest blog By Grey Putnam 

The So-Called Religious Freedom of Indiana

Indy Feminists Blog

If I’m going to be honest, I have been dreading this day since election night 2014. We knew it was coming. With historically low voter turnout, Indiana’s most vulnerable populations were in even more danger of losing their rights. We at Indy Feminists registered hundreds of voters, and it was a tough blow to see the election results. That is to say, historic gains on the stranglehold the so-called “Christian” Right already had on Indiana’s legislature.

Now the burden is to mitigate the damage we’re stuck with.

Yesterday, a tyrant I did not vote for signed a hate bill into law.

Today, the nation responded by saying “Boycott Indiana.” One of my heroes, George Takei, has called for this.

And I understand. There is so much anger, so much rage, and most of those people calling to hurt us economically have no personal investment in this state.

But I would…

View original post 357 more words

Why is so much “inspirational” material so ableist?

Let me start by saying that I respect people’s need for re-framing techniques and stress management. I really do. Even people who are mentally and physically average through and through who have no notable impairments whatsoever still get into very bad situations and struggle to cope. I don’t begrudge all of them their coping. However, sometimes their very public displays of coping run headfirst into my coping and others’ coping and make it harder. It is at that point that it becomes a problem.

I will share a few prominent strains of ableism I’m observed in inspirational materials.

1) Erasure of the disabled/the possibility that disability exists

One graphic, typical of the genre, reads “if you want to be happy, be.” This may make some kind of sense to someone who is psychologically healthy, but is complete balderdash to someone with a painful and severe mental illness.  The assumption that everyone has an unlimited potential for emotional regulation is really irritating. If this statement makes sense to you, why not just enjoy your mental control and capacity for self regulation? Why broadly share this thing that erases the reality of others who struggle profoundly with emotional regulation?

Another graphic cheerfully pronounces that “you (presumably anyone) are only one workout away from a good mood.” Again, while that may be true for some portion of the population, many are embroiled in a protracted battle for mood stabilization for which there is no “cheat,” while many others are forced to endure excruciating exercises in service of debilitating health conditions. Someone may not see the big deal here, but these microagressions and moments of isolation for one person who has severe depression and another person with a newer prosthetic limb really add up to quite a shit pile of bad feels.

Another common inspirational phrase “pain is just weakness leaving your body” is the kind of thing you would feel very rude saying to someone going through chemotherapy, or with fibromyalgia or rheumatoid arthritis, but people do that exact thing every day by broadly sharing these image macros.

2) Content that really takes an unfortunate, discouraging meaning when it collides with a disabled person

This fitness inspirational graphic loudly pronounces “you earn your body.” While, on its own, it is already pretty rude and has a substantial whiff of fat shaming, it is an enormous, egregious “fuck you” to anyone with a physical disability.

This emotional regulation mantra “positive thinking will let you do everything better than negative thinking will” may seem like a gentle reminder, an obvious truism to someone who is mentally healthy. To someone with severe anxiety or depression, it’s like someone is gloating about their superior ability. It’s like they’re sort of rubbing it in that your disability presents obstacles to your functioning.

Another one that takes a very unfortunate meaning for people living with severe anxiety, this graphic reads “A head full of fears has no space for dreams.” This is a pretty harsh message of hopelessness for a fear disordered person, in service of a flowery reminder to the abled to chill out occasionally. Is it really necessary?

3) Brazen exploitation

This graphic shows two pictures of one legged men, possibly the same man. The one on the left is average in build but the one on the right is an advanced body builder. It is meant to resemble a “before and after” fitness comparison and is labeled with the phrase “excuses: let’s hear yours again.” First of all, I’m not convinced these are even the same guy, not because men with one leg can’t go from being average to being body builders, but because it just doesn’t look like the same guy to me. The idea that someone might juxtapose two disabled guys, conflating them as more or less the same because leg, and using them this way is staggeringly gross, but I can’t prove it. Second, and more importantly, I’m not sure why the man in the “after” picture became a body builder, but it is very unlikely that he did it in order to scold people who “make excuses” not to work out. It was clearly something that was very important to him and probably very personal. Repurposing his image and story in this way (and probably without his permission) is extremely exploitative.

This graphic features what looks like probably a stock photo of a guy in a wheelchair superimposed with the quote “The only disability in life is a bad attitude.” This quote is attributed to Scott Hamilton, a guy who is not only not a disabled person, but is an elite olympic athlete, an industry notoriously inaccessible to the physically disabled (yes, I do know there are exceptions). Needless to say, people in wheelchairs aren’t using them for your uplifting moments or daily affirmations. They’re just using them. To live their lives. Don’t exploit that to simulate sentimentality.

4) stigma/aversion

There is an abundance of inspirational material that seems to advise people to shun people with emotional difficulties, for fear of their contagion. Sure, one can argue that these images are speaking about meanies and haters as opposed to disabled people trapped in a depressive funk or an anxiety loop, but that is rarely clear. If that’s the case, why leave the ambiguity?

This graphic reads “you can’t keep a clean reputation hanging out with messy people”

This one reads “the less you respond to negative people, the more peaceful your life will become.”

This one reads “Protect your spirit from contamination. Limit your time with negative people.”

So, enough of this shit, alright? Like if you enjoy it privately and it holds a constrained, non-ableist meaning for you, that’s cool, but if you blast it in a public forum, it’s going to hit some people. Peace.

I don’t feel sorry for cops.

I’m tired of constantly being fed this narrative about how hard it is to be a cop and how me must pity and coddle them while we beg for our lives and our rights and those of our friends.

I’m tired of being told that we must always, always at every turn remember that some of them are good, although the “good” ones are constantly using this statement as a way to shut down and derail criticism of the definitely bad cops.

I’m tired of hearing that they’re all really heroes, and that it is necessary to occasionally spill the blood of black innocents on the altar of that heroism, because they’re so, so desperately afraid that mistakes get made.

Let me start to explain a few reasons why I refuse to play out this melodrama anymore.

Let’s start with that underpaid, overworked, tired and battered shit, shall we?

As it turns out, the junior-most, lowest paid 10% of cops are earning a little more than 33k a year, which is at least 50% more than an E2 (army enlisted officer, second rank), for reference. That’s right! The guy that arrested you at the “fight for 15” rally is earning, at the absolute lowest, more than 15. And that’s the low end. The middle of the road for police is more like 55k, which is about twice what a newly minted E6 (staff sergeant) makes in the army. Police higher up the chain can earn all the way into six figures.

“But they’re putting their life on the line every day!” you might say

Did you know that store clerks are more than twice as likely to be homicide victims on the job when compared to police? No one seems to think about this when they go into retail, but it’s one of the worst jobs out there for murder risk. The same BLS statistics show that more police die in roadway accidents than are homicide victims. Even with the roadway and homicide deaths combined, more people are dying in the course of retail work. As far as overall death rates, including traffic incidents, loggers and fishers each have more than twice the workplace fatalities that police do.